STEP / 01
Ingest your real material
Upload report sections, supporting docs, and prior-year disclosures. ESGvist parses long documents, tables, and annexes into retrievable evidence blocks — page and position preserved.
Audit-grade ESG reporting
From regulatory pressure to citation-backed disclosures.
ESGvist is built for teams that need defensible outputs, not generic AI text. Upload your report, run requirement-by-requirement checks across GRI, ESRS, SASB industry standards and IFRS S1/S2, and get a clear pass/gap map with page-level evidence.
Early access open. We are selecting the first beta testers — a limited group of practitioners who will shape the product. Write to us to be among the first.
No evidence → no claim. Every answer points to source context.
GRI
ESRS
SASB
IFRS S1/S2
California SB 253
California SB 261
UAE Law 11/2024
TCFD
TNFD
CDP
GHG Protocol
SBTi
UN SDGs
EU Taxonomy
SFDR
CSDDD
UN Global Compact
15+
Years of practitioner ESG advisory behind the product design.
20+
Prominent companies advised across governance and disclosure practice.
7,500+
Structured requirements and data points across GRI, ESRS, SASB and IFRS.
1 day
Same-day target for a first requirement-based review (typical).
How it works
From document upload to board-ready output in three steps
ESG teams do not need another chatbot. They need a repeatable compliance workflow that produces defensible outputs every reporting cycle.
STEP / 02
Run requirement-by-requirement checks
Each disclosure is evaluated against specific requirements rather than summarised in one vague answer. Consistent, requirement-level statuses: YES / PARTIAL / NO.
STEP / 03
Ship fixes, then keep them current
Review gaps, draft updates, export evidence-backed outputs. Next year, refresh the same sections: delta mapping, conflict flags, evidence trail intact.
Review cycle3–6 months manual → days to first full review
Deliverableunstructured memos → requirement-status matrix with evidence
Trust model“AI says so” → source-grounded claims or explicit “not found”
The product
Eight workflows live in the product today
Each workflow has a clear input, a structured process, and a deliverable you can take to a reviewer or an auditor. No feature sprawl — just outcomes.
Compliance Review
A section against selected disclosures — or a full report against a framework scope. YES / PARTIAL / NO per requirement, gap notes, page-level evidence, and a coverage map with prioritised remediation.
Materiality Assessment
Guided double-materiality assessment with country and sector profiles, AI-assisted topic recommendations, and an audit trail of every scoring decision.
Sustainability Report Architect
Framework-aware report skeleton mapped to requirements — start from a compliant structure, not a blank page.
Data Collection Builder
Turn selected disclosures into structured collection templates: indicators, units and guidance per data point — built on 5,700+ catalogued data points.
Disclosure Drafting
Standards-aligned drafts grounded in your workspace evidence, with a transparent citation trail. Batch mode covers multiple disclosures in one run.
Annual Section Refresh
Update last year’s sections with this year’s material: delta mapping, conflict flags, reviewer sign-off — built for the recurring annual cycle.
Standards Counsel
Cross-framework questions answered with clause-level citations from the catalogue — including how requirements map across GRI, ESRS, SASB and IFRS.
Professional ESG Translation
Full disclosure documents translated with ESG terminology control, automated QA gates and reviewer checkpoints — one evidence base, two audit-ready documents.
Standards catalogue
What’s covered, and how deeply
Requirement-level checks run against a structured catalogue. Wider framework context comes from a 60+ framework registry. We label the difference clearly.
● Requirement level
Core catalogue
GRI (42 standards incl. sector) · ESRS (full Set 1: ESRS 2, E1–E5, S1–S4, G1) · SASB (76 industry standards) · IFRS S1/S2 — disclosures and data points, checked requirement by requirement with verbatim citations.
● Regulatory instruments
Beyond the EU perimeter
Catalogued at requirement level: California SB 253 & SB 261 climate acts and UAE Federal Decree-Law 11/2024 — for teams reporting across jurisdictions.
● Guidance level
Cross-framework registry
60+ frameworks — TCFD, TNFD, CDP, GHG Protocol, SBTi, UN SDGs, EU Taxonomy, SFDR, CSDDD, UN Global Compact and more — used for mapping, materiality context and counsel.
1,987 disclosures
5,777 data points
131 standards in catalogue
63 frameworks in registry
Who builds this
Built by a practitioner who spent years inside ESG delivery
Enterprise buyers evaluate competence before interface. ESGvist is grounded in 15+ years of hands-on advisory, standards work and real disclosure execution — not a generic AI wrapper.
Dr Ross Kurinko
Founder and Architect, ESGvist
PhD
GRI trainer
Cambridge University
15+ years of practice across sustainability strategy, ESG communications and corporate reporting; ESG governance and disclosure architecture built from scratch for a major European railway organisation.
20+ prominent businesses advised and hundreds of professionals trained in disclosure execution; official tutor for GRI training pathways; qualified CSR consultant under the EBRD BAS programme.
Hands-on collaboration with ecosystem leaders including GRI, S&P Global, Moody’s, Sustainalytics and CDP.
The product logic mirrors how experienced ESG teams work: clarify requirement scope, map evidence, mark uncertainty — and never pretend certainty where support is missing.
In the field
Where this is being used
Anonymised engagements from the current early-access group.
EU Industrials
ESRS E1 gap review completed in one day with requirement-level evidence mapping for internal sign-off.
Bilingual reporter
Full disclosure pack produced in two languages with terminology QA — one evidence base, two audit-ready documents.
Consultancy
Multi-client workspace model used to standardise review quality across multiple disclosure projects.
Pricing
Simple, transparent pricing
Every plan includes the workflows and citation-backed output. Pick by team size, frameworks and the review velocity your cycle demands.
Solo
Starter
$249 / month
- 1 user and one framework of choice.
- All core workflows + citation-backed output.
- Best for single ESG manager workflows.
Most chosen
Teams & consultancies
Team
$699 / month
- Up to 5 users with shared workspace execution.
- Full catalogue: GRI, ESRS, SASB, IFRS S1/S2 + 60-framework registry.
- Cross-framework mapping and higher-assurance review mode.
Multi-entity
Enterprise
$1,299 / month
- 15+ users and multiple workspaces for group reporting.
- Highest quotas: 500 documents, large files, priority processing.
- Guided onboarding, priority support, audit-ready evidence exports.
FAQ
Quick answers for buyer and delivery teams
How is this different from a generic AI assistant?
ESGvist is organised around requirement-level checks and evidence traceability, not open-ended text generation. Every claim is either grounded in a cited source or explicitly marked as a gap — and that refusal behaviour is regression-tested on every release.
Which frameworks are supported, and how deeply?
Requirement-level checks with verbatim citations: GRI, ESRS, SASB industry standards and IFRS S1/S2, plus regulatory instruments (California SB 253/261, UAE 11/2024). Guidance-level support via a 60+ framework registry — TCFD, TNFD, CDP, GHG Protocol, SBTi, UN SDGs, EU Taxonomy, SFDR and more. We label the difference clearly in the product.
Do you support source citations?
Yes — page-level references from your uploaded documents, and clause-level references from the standards catalogue.
Can this run with enterprise privacy controls?
Workspaces are isolated per client, your documents are not used to train AI models, and every output carries a verifiable evidence trail. Stricter deployment models (SSO, private deployment) are on the enterprise roadmap — book a call and we will be straight about what is available today.
What is the governing principle?
No evidence → no claim. Missing support is marked explicitly so review teams can close the gap before publication.
Ready for defensible ESG outputs?
ESGvist is built for ESG teams, sustainability managers and consultancies who need audit-grade traceability — not generic AI text. We are onboarding the first beta testers now.